hat was my point as well. They lost the game to FB because of lacking to create engagement.
Like
Reply
6
5 years ago
Read full comment
No. LINKEDIN Groups are usually owned by bigger organizations and companies who seem to have a monopoly in controlling many of the similar ones. And then they spam you with emails that aren't related at all.
Future marketing. The future is Gen Z. And they are apparently not at all interested in super polished brand messages. They really want authenticity. They want to see you as their peer not a person trying to sell to them. This weekend I’m supposed to shoot video for my landing page. And I’m now stuck between shooting it with a dslr with a nice backdrop or just with my iPhone in my kitchen. iPhone video would be more authentic/real but could also be perceived as unprofessional/half baked? Thoughts?
Regarding PBN - I have built many private PBNs - and still doing that - how would you debunk a set of sites sitting on different IP addresses, diversified WHOIS info, not linking to the same websites and of course not having GA code? Mm... did I miss anything? ))
There was no evidence of that, it was another bit of fake news during the 2016 election campaign - I'm just saying that is the route they would choose if they wanted to rather than Twitter.
AI can only do so much due to the amount of data required to train a model so I think humans are our best bet and making the recruitment process better.
I can see MAJOR problems with this as it is implemented. What if you have an astigmatism or are on the autistic spectrum and are unable to make eye contact?
Hi, we're doing a similar campaign at the moment, unfortunately, just banners on websites (no FB/twitter/linkedin) and scraping provided us with a lot of contacts. I'll post my feedback on this in 2-3 weeks.
In my experience emailing our list of 15,000 + students emojis simply don't work. I have tested multiple headlines with and without emojis and the latter always performs better.